Every so often I run into a story that feels less like a piece of fiction and more like a magic trick. Vladimir Nabokov's Signs and Symbols is one of those stories.
On the surface, almost nothing happens. An elderly couple attempts to visit their son in a sanitarium on his birthday. They bring him a basket of fruit jellies as a gift. When they arrive, they learn that he has recently attempted suicide and cannot receive visitors. They return home disappointed. Later that night, after reflecting on their son's life and discussing the possibility of bringing him home, they receive a series of mysterious phone calls before the story abruptly ends.
That's the plot.
Yet despite its simplicity, Signs and Symbols has generated decades of debate. Readers pore over the story looking for clues, hidden meanings, and secret connections. This obsession is not accidental. In fact, it may be the entire point.
Referential Mania
The story's most famous passage describes the son's condition, which a doctor calls "referential mania."
According to the description, the young man believes that everything around him is secretly referring to him. Clouds communicate information about him. Trees discuss him. Random patterns, shadows, and objects contain messages intended specifically for him. The entire universe has become a coded language that revolves around his existence.
The condition is terrifying because it transforms ordinary reality into an endless puzzle. Nothing can simply be what it is. Every detail becomes evidence. Every coincidence becomes a clue.
At first this seems like a description of the son's illness.
By the end of the story, however, something strange has happened.
It becomes a description of the reader.
How Nabokov Turns the Reader into the Patient
The story ends with a series of telephone calls. A young woman repeatedly asks for someone named Charlie. Twice the parents explain that she has the wrong number. Then the phone rings a third time.
And then the story ends.
Naturally, readers begin searching for explanations.
Who is Charlie?
Why does the phone ring three times?
Is the caller connected to the son?
Has something happened at the sanitarium?
Are the repeated phone calls merely coincidence?
Nabokov never answers these questions.
But the unanswered questions are only the beginning.
Readers begin noticing other patterns.
The son has attempted suicide multiple times.
The story is divided into three sections.
Bird imagery appears throughout the story.
Playing cards repeatedly surface in the mother's memories.
Details that initially seemed incidental begin to feel charged with significance.
Before long, we are doing exactly what the son does. We are scanning reality for hidden messages. We are turning random details into signs and symbols.
Nabokov has quietly maneuvered us into sharing the perspective of his protagonist.
That is one of the most impressive feats of narrative design I have ever encountered.
The Real Subject: Parental Love
For all the discussion surrounding the ending, I suspect the emotional center of the story lies elsewhere.
The parents are exhausted.
They are aging.
They have sacrificed years of their lives to caring for a son whose suffering they cannot relieve.
Yet they continue.
They make the long trip to see him.
They worry about him constantly.
They debate bringing him home despite the burden it would place upon them.
One of the most moving passages arrives when the mother reflects on what life has become. She thinks about "the incalculable amount of tenderness contained in the world" and the ways that tenderness is crushed, wasted, or transformed into madness.
That observation seems to reach beyond the son's illness. It becomes a meditation on human love itself.
The parents cannot fix their son's condition.
They cannot understand his private world.
They cannot protect him from his own mind.
But they continue loving him anyway.
The story's mystery often overshadows this emotional core, but I think it is what gives the story its lasting power.
What Writers Can Learn
1. Ambiguity Works Best When Everything Else Is Clear
Many beginning writers mistake ambiguity for vagueness.
Nabokov does the opposite.
The setting is clear.
The characters are clear.
The emotional stakes are clear.
The prose is precise.
Only one crucial piece remains unresolved.
Because the foundation is solid, the ambiguity becomes fascinating rather than frustrating.
2. Patterns Create Meaning
Readers naturally look for repetition.
A single detail is description.
A repeated detail becomes a pattern.
A pattern becomes a question.
A question creates engagement.
Whether or not the repeated elements in Signs and Symbols actually possess hidden significance is almost beside the point. Nabokov understands that readers cannot resist trying to connect them.
3. Trust the Reader
Nabokov never stops to explain the story's meaning.
He does not tell us how to interpret the ending.
He does not provide a final revelation.
He trusts readers to do the work themselves.
That trust creates a far more active reading experience than a neatly explained conclusion ever could.
Final Thoughts
The brilliance of Signs and Symbols is that it functions simultaneously as a story and as a demonstration.
It tells us about a young man who sees secret meanings everywhere.
Then it causes us to do exactly the same thing.
By the final page, we have become interpreters of patterns, hunters of clues, and decoders of messages. We are searching for significance in every detail, wondering whether anything in the story is accidental.
In other words, we have entered the son's world.
Few stories manage to blur the line between form and content so completely. Fewer still accomplish it in only a handful of pages.
For writers, Signs and Symbols is a reminder that the most powerful stories do not merely describe an experience. They create it.
If you found this article helpful, you can support Short Fiction Daily here:
Buy Me a Coffe